<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My First Copy of Astronomy Now Magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.astronomylog.co.uk/2007/08/15/my-first-copy-of-astronomy-now-magazine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.astronomylog.co.uk/2007/08/15/my-first-copy-of-astronomy-now-magazine/</link>
	<description>My images and view of the Nights Sky</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 03:26:27 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Pearson</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomylog.co.uk/2007/08/15/my-first-copy-of-astronomy-now-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomylog.co.uk/2007/08/15/my-first-copy-of-astronomy-now-magazine/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>In the UK Sky and Telescope is available in most newsagents (big and small). You&#039;ll generally find &lt;i&gt;Sky and Telescope&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Astronomy&lt;/i&gt; (the other venerable US astronomy magazine) in most newsagents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the UK Sky and Telescope is available in most newsagents (big and small). You&#8217;ll generally find <i>Sky and Telescope</i> and <i>Astronomy</i> (the other venerable US astronomy magazine) in most newsagents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomylog.co.uk/2007/08/15/my-first-copy-of-astronomy-now-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomylog.co.uk/2007/08/15/my-first-copy-of-astronomy-now-magazine/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment.

I visited the Sky and Telescope site, as I had not heard of this magazine before.

I take it that you cannot purchase a one off copy in the UK without subscribing?

The price is around $60 a year, which is not bad at the current dollar to sterling exchange rate, and so makes it about £30 a year - the same price as other UK astronomy magazines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>I visited the Sky and Telescope site, as I had not heard of this magazine before.</p>
<p>I take it that you cannot purchase a one off copy in the UK without subscribing?</p>
<p>The price is around $60 a year, which is not bad at the current dollar to sterling exchange rate, and so makes it about £30 a year &#8211; the same price as other UK astronomy magazines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Pearson</title>
		<link>http://www.astronomylog.co.uk/2007/08/15/my-first-copy-of-astronomy-now-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.astronomylog.co.uk/2007/08/15/my-first-copy-of-astronomy-now-magazine/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>For my money Astronomy Now is the winner without a doubt. While I don&#039;t think it&#039;s quite as good a read as Sky and Telescope, I much prefer it to Sky at Night.

I took Sky at Night for the first few issues (probably 6 or so) but soon got the feeling that I just wasn&#039;t getting value for money. I found most of the articles to be far too lightweight, the CD/DVD to be close to useless and, well, the whole thing just seemed far too expensive for what it delivered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For my money Astronomy Now is the winner without a doubt. While I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s quite as good a read as Sky and Telescope, I much prefer it to Sky at Night.</p>
<p>I took Sky at Night for the first few issues (probably 6 or so) but soon got the feeling that I just wasn&#8217;t getting value for money. I found most of the articles to be far too lightweight, the CD/DVD to be close to useless and, well, the whole thing just seemed far too expensive for what it delivered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
